•  
  •  
 

Keywords

Cranioplasty, Polymethylmethacrylate PMMA, Finite element analysis, Cranial implant, Mechanical properties

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

Appropriate cranial implants are essential due to a worldwide population that is aging and the rising incidence of trauma. One key element affecting cranial implants' performance is their biomechanical behavior in human skull bones. This paper describes a high-quality cranial implant design approach for the defective skull based on computed tomography CT scan images and the biomechanical performance analysis of rehabilitation human skull bones. The valuable contribution of this work is the effective utilization of finite element analysis FEA to contrast the material behaviors of Polymethylmethacrylate PMMA cranial implants and autologous skull bone during rehabilitation as exposed to external trauma. The external loads applied in the implant's center are attached to a damaged cranium (300, 600, and 1000 N). The findings indicated that the equivalent stresses of PMMA are close to the skull bone. Minimum and maximum Von Mises stresses are (13 and 47 MPa) when employing a PMMA implant material and (12 and 41 MPa) when utilizing autologous skull bone at the lowest and highest level of applied force (300 and 1000 N), respectively. In terms of deformation distribution (0.02 and 0.03 mm) at applying 300 N, approximately six times the weight of a human head when the reconstruction is performed by skull bone and PMMA, respectively. So, this study will offer an insightful look at the neurocranial protection of PMMA implants that provide the coupling of skull bone-PMMA cranial implant, which guarantees adequate protection for the internal structures of the restored area similar to the autologous skull bone.

References

Wu, L. Ma , Q. Liu, L. Feng, Z. Wang, A. Ohrndorf, H. Christ, J. Xiong, Impact response and energy absorption of human skull cellular bones, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 81(2018)106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.02.018 Popp, G. Rusu, S. Gabriel Racz, I. Popp, Force and thickness prediction with FEA of the cranial implants manufactured through SPIF, MATEC Web Conf., 290 (2019) 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929004008 Motherway, P. Verschueren, G. Perre, J. Sloten, M. Gilchrist, The mechanical properties of cranial bone: The effect of loading rate and cranial sampling position, J. Biomech., 42 (2009) 2129–2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.030 K. Vallittu, K. M. J. Aitasalo, A. A. Mäkitie, P. Helén, C. Lindqvist, Reconstruction of cranial bone defects with fiber-reinforced composite–bioactive glass implants, (2015). Bogu, Y. Kumar, A. Khanra, Homogenous scaffold-based cranial/skull implant modelling and structural analysis—unit cell algorithm-meshless approach, Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 55 (2017) 2053–2065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-017-1649-3 Elshirbiny, A. Ahmed, M. Amen, Autograft cranioplasty for skull defects in children, Interdiscip. Neurosurg., 33 (2023) 101789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2023.101789 Basu, N. Bhaskar , S. Barui, V. Sharma , S. Das , N. Govindarajan, P. Hegde , P. Perikal , M. Shivakumar , K. Khanapure A. Jagannatha., Evaluation of implant properties, safety profile and clinical efficacy of patient-specific acrylic prosthesis in cranioplasty using 3D binderjet printed cranium model: A pilot study, J. Clin. Neurosci., 85 (2021) 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.020 Moiduddin, S. Mian, H. Alkhalefah, S. Ramalingam, A. Sayeed, Customized Cost-Effective Cranioplasty for Large Asymmetrical Defects, Processes, 11(2023)1760. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11061760 Abd El-Ghani, Cranioplasty with polymethyl methacrylate implant: solutions of pitfalls, Egypt. J. Neurosurg., 33 (2018) 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41984-018-0002-y Sable, M. Patel, K. Shah, A Prospective Comparative Study of Different Methods of Cranioplasty: Our Institutional Experience, Indian J. Neurosurg., 09 (2020) 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402929 Kwarcinski, P. Boughton, A. Ruys, A. Doolan, J. Gelder, Cranioplasty and craniofacial reconstruction: A review of implant material, manufacturing method and infection risk, Appl. Sci., 7 (2017) 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/app7030276 N.T. Kim, C.X. Binh, V.T. Dung, T.V. Toan‏, Design and mechanical evaluation of a large cranial implant and fixation parts, Interdiscip. Neurosurg., 31 (2023) 101676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inat.2022.101676 Huang, S. Zhong, S. Susarla, E. Swanson, J. Huang, C. Gordon, Craniofacial Reconstruction With Poly (Methyl Methacrylate) Customized Cranial Implants, J. Craniofac. Surg., 26 (2015) 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001315 Obaeed, W. Hamdan, Optimizing Fused Deposition Modelling Process Parameters for Medical Grade Polymethylmethacrylate Flexural Strength, Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J., 18 (2024) 349–359. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/182876 Khader, M. Towler, Materials and techniques used in cranioplasty fixation: A review, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 66 (2016) 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.101 Jegadeesan, M. Baldia, B. Basu, Next-generation personalized cranioplasty treatment, Acta Biomater., 154 (2022) 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.030 Shah, H. Jung, S. Skirboll, Materials used in cranioplasty: A history and analysis, J. Neurosurg., 36 (2014) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS13561 I. Martmez-Valencia, C. H. Navarro, J. A. Vazquez-Lopez, J. L. Hernandez-Arellano, J. A. Jimenez-Garda, and J. L. Dfaz-Leon, Optimization of titanium cranial implant designs using generalized reduced gradient method, analysis of finite elements, and artificial neural networks, Rev. Int. Metod. Numer. para Calc. y Disen. enIng., 38 (2022) 1-16. https://doi.org/10.23967/j.rimni.2022.06.004 Moiduddin, S. Mian, U. Umer, H. Alkhalefah, Fabrication and analysis of a Ti6Al4V implant for cranial restoration, Appl. Sci., 9 (2019) 2513 . https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122513 Chamrad L. Borak, Finite Element Analysis Of Cranial Implant, 22nd International Conference Engineering Mechanics, October, 2016. Ameen, A. Al-Ahmari, M. Mohammed, O. Abdulhameed, U. Umer, K. Moiduddin, Design, finite element analysis (FEA), and fabrication of custom titanium alloy cranial implant using electron beam melting additive manufacturing, Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag., 13 (2018) 267–278. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2018.3.289 Santos, G. Carmo, R. Alves, F. Fernandes, M. Ptak, Mechanical Strength Study of a Cranial Implant Using Computational Tools, Appl. Sci., 12 (2022) 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12020878 Moncayo-Matute, E. Vázquez-Silva, P. Peña-Tapia, P. Torres-Jara, D. Moya-Loaiza, T. Viloria-Ávila, Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Study, Polymers, 15 (2023) 3620. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173620 Mejía Rodríguez, O. González-Estrada, D. Villegas-Bermúdez, Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific Cranial Implants under Different Design Parameters for Material Selection, Designs, 8 (2024)1-13 . https://doi.org/10.3390/designs8020031 Egger, M. Gall, A. Tax, M. Ücal, X. Li, G. Campe, U. Schäfer, D. Schmalstieg, X. Chen., Interactive reconstructions of cranial 3D implants under MeVisLab as an alternative to commercial planning software, PLoS One, 12 (2017)1-20 . https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172694 Arango-Ospina C. Cortés-Rodriguez, Engineering Design and Manufacturing of Custom Craniofacial Implants, The 15th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, 43, 2014, 908–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02913-9_234 Obaeed, Numerical and Experimental Explorations for the Formability of Drawing Square Cups Through Deep Drawing Operation , Eng. Technol. J., 38 (2020) 1316–1326. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.v38i9A.1340/4.0 Al-Ahmari, E. Nasr, K. Moiduddin, S. Anwar, M. Al Kindi, A. Kamrani, A comparative study on the customized design of mandibular reconstruction plates using finite element method, Adv. Mech. Eng., 7 (2015) 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814015593890 Mian, K. Moiduddin, S. Elseufy, H. Alkhalefah, Adaptive Mechanism for Designing a Personalized Cranial Implant and its 3d printing using peek, Polymers , 14 (2022) 1266 . https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14061266 Sukindar, N. Samsudin, S. Shaharuddin, S. Kamaruddin, The Effects of FDM Printing Parameters on the Compression Properties of Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) using Finite Element Analysis, Int. J. Integr. Eng., 14 (2022) 86–92. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijie.2022.14.02.013 Moncayo-Matute, P. Peña-Tapia, E. Vázquez-Silva, P. Torres-Jara, D. Moya-Loaiza, G. Abad-Farfán, A. Andrade-Galarza, Surgical planning and finite element analysis for the neurocraneal protection in cranioplasty with PMMA: A case study, Nati. Lib. Medicine, 8 (2022) e10706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10706 Moncayo-Matute, E. Vázquez-Silva, P. Torres-Jara, P. Peña-Tapia, D. Moya-Loayza, G. Abad-Farán, Mechanical analysis for personalized implant for neurocranial protection manufactured with Polymethylmethacrylate, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2516 (2023) 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2516/1/012005

Highlights

A high-quality, patient-specific cranial implant was designed using computed tomography (CT) images. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to assess stress distribution and deformation in biomechanics. A biomechanical comparison of autologous skull bone and polymethylmethacrylate implants was conducted.

DOI

10.30684/etj.2024.148915.1735

First Page

1435

Last Page

1445

Download

Share

COinS