•  
  •  
 

Keywords

Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) UAV, SfM Photogrammetry Data Fusion Deformation Analysis Oil Tank Calibration

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

Laser scanning systems are used to capture high-resolution 3D point clouds, thereby obtaining the object geometry. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) technology is an essential data capture tool for providing high-quality point clouds for industrial environments. However, TLS point clouds can be lacking and incomplete due to occlusions prevalent in complicated industrial environments. The static nature of the system makes it necessary to use a complementary data collection technique, such as cameras, to fill the gaps, enrich density, and improve data quality. Therefore, in this research, an integrated work frame was presented that would allow for the automatic and reliable direct co-registration of TLS data and photogrammetry of industrial objects. Combining TLS data and photogrammetric-derived SfM-MVS techniques makes getting a comprehensive dataset of complex objects possible. This is accomplished by employing individual approaches in situations that provide the most favorable conditions for operation. This research aims to detect deformation and determine the geometric features of oil plant equipment (tanks) in industrial sites. This was achieved by integrating TLS and UAV photogrammetry measurements of an oil plant in Basra City, Iraq. The gaps in the point cloud coverage introduced by TLS and UAV individual measurements are eliminated following the integration process. Detailed comparison analyses are performed on cross-sections, and the results are analyzed to show potential found to comply within a few millimeters. After data integration and accuracy analysis, the RMSE was withdrawn to reach 3 cm. This research approves the potential of data fusion to detect deformations in industrial sites.

References

I. Kadhim, F. M. Abed, J. M. Vilbig, V. Sagan, C. DeSilvey, Combining Remote Sensing Approaches for Detecting Marks of Archaeological and Demolished Constructions in Cahokia’s Grand Plaza, Southwestern Illinois, Remote. Sens., 15 (2023) 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041057 L. Kovanič, M. Štroner, P. Blistan, R. Urban, R. Boczek, Combined ground-based and UAS SfM-MVS approach for determination of geometric parameters of the large-scale industrial facility – Case study, Measurement, 216 (2023) 112994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112994 A. S. Jaber, F. M. Abed, Revealing the potentials of 3D modelling techniques; a comparison study towards data fusion from hybrid sensors, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., 737, 2020, 012230. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/737/1/012230 G. Lenda, U. Marmol, Integration of high-precision UAV laser scanning and terrestrial scanning measurements for determining the shape of a water tower, Measurement, 218 (2023) 113178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113178 L. Koranic, P. Blistan, R. Urban, M. Stronger, K. Pukanská , K. Bartoš , J. Palková, Analytical determination of geometric parameters of the rotary kiln by novel approach of tls point cloud segmentation, Appl. Sci., 10 (2020) 7652. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217652 Y. Alshawabkeh, A. Baik, Y. Miky, Integration of Laser Scanner and Photogrammetry for Heritage BIM Enhancement, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 10 (2021) 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050316 G. Kafataris, D. Skarlatos, M. Vlachos, Fusion of Direct Georeferenced Aerial Drone with Terrestrial Laser Scanner Data the Case of the Roman Baths of Amathus, Cyprus, ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., X-1/W1-2023 (2023)1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-X-1-W1-2023-1057-2023 A. Capolupo, A. Maltese, M. Saponaro, D. Costantino, Integration of terrestrial laser scanning and UAV-SFM technique to generate a detailed 3D textured model of a heritage building, 11534 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2574034 L. Kovanič, P. Peťovský, B. Topitzer, P. Blišťan, Spatial Analysis of Point Clouds Obtained by SfM Photogrammetry and the TLS Method—Study in Quarry Environment, Land, 13 (2024) 614. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050614 J. Siwiec, G. Lenda, Integration of terrestrial laser scanning and structure from motion for the assessment of industrial chimney geometry, Measurement, 199 (2022) 111404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111404 J. Li, Y. Peng, Z. Tang, Z. Li, Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Railway Bridges Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle–Terrestrial Laser Scanner Point Cloud Fusion, Buildings, 13 (2023) 2841. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112841 P. Budzianowski, P. Tysiac, Combined close range photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for ship hull modelling, Geosciences, 9 (2019) 242. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9050242 M. Guo, X. Tang, Y. Zhao, Y. Liu, Z. Chen, L. Zhu, K. Guo, Monitoring Scheme of Liquified Natural Gas External Tank Using Air–Space–Land Integration Multisource Remote Sensing, Sens. Mater., 36 (2024) 373–392. https://doi.org/10.18494/SAM4603 A. Soni, S. Robson, B. Gleeson, Structural monitoring for the rail industry using conventional survey, laser scanning and photogrammetry, Appl. Geomat., 7 (2015) 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-015-0156-1 A. Z. Khalaf, A. S. J. Al-Saedi, Assessment of Structure with Analytical Digital Close Range Photogrammetry, Eng. Technol. J., 34 (2016) 2140–2151. http://dx.doi.org/10.30684/etj.34.11A.18 “Leica TS09 Plus.” [Online]. Available: https://www.sccssurvey.co.uk/leica-flexline-ts09plus-total-station.html “CHCNAV i50 GNSS.” [Online]. Available: https://chcnav.com/uploads/i50_DS_EN.pdf Leica ScanStation C40.” [Online]. Available: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanners/scanners/leica-scanstation-p40--p30 “DJI Phantom 4 Pro.” [Online]. Available: https://www.dji.com/sk/phantom-4-pro R. M. Ridha, I. A. Alwan, H. S. Ismael, Accuracy assessment of UAV automated 3D city model for urban planning, AIP Conf. Proc., 2793, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0162664 R. M. Ridha, I. A. Alwan, H. S. Ismael, Accuracy assessment of 3D model reconstructed from UAV images by the distribution of the ground control points (GCPs), AIP Conf. Proc., 3105, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0212203 A. M. Noori, A. S. J. Al-Saedi, F. M. Abed, Optimizing Application of UAV-Based SfM Photogrammetric 3D Mapping in Urban Areas, J. Sci., 65 (2024) 2958–2975. https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2024.65.5.46 A. Z. Khalaf, N. S. Mohammed, F. S. A. Al-hasoon, Accuracy Assessment of Analytical Orientation Process in Close range Photogrammetry, Eng. Technol. J., 34 (2016) 2739–2753. https://doi.org/10.30684/etj.34.14A.17 A. H. Hadi, A. Z. Khalaf, Accuracy Assessment of Establishing 3D Real Scale Model in Close-Range Photogrammetry with Digital Camera, Eng. Technol. J., 40 (2022) 1492-1509. http://dx.doi.org/10.30684/etj.2022.132233.1097 Leica Cyclone.” [Online]. Available: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanners/software/leica-cyclone W. Moussa, K. Wenzel, M. Rothermel, M. Abdel-Wahab, D. Fritsch, Complementing TLS Point Clouds by Dense Image Matching, Int. J. Heritage in the Digital Era, 2 (2013) 453-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.2.3.453 Agisoft Metashape”, [Online]. Available: https://www.agisoft.com/features/professional-edition/ Reality Capture.” [Online]. Available: https://www.capturingreality.com/ CloudCompare.” [Online]. Available: https://www.danielgm.net/cc/ A. S. J. Al-Saedi, F. M. Abed, I. A. Alwan, Geometric Quality Analysis of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Data for Industrial Usage, IIUM Eng. J., 25 (2024) 148–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v25i2.3211 Leica Cyclone.” [Online]. Available: https://leica-geosystems.com/products/laser-scanners/software/leica-cyclone/ leica-cyclone-3dr

Highlights

Integrating terrestrial laser scanning and photogrammetry enhanced data quality, comprehension, and interpretation. Photogrammetry is considered a complementary data source if TLS produces insufficient data. Measurements using fused point clouds produced reliable metric values for industrial applications.

DOI

10.30684/etj.2024.153203.1810

First Page

1417

Last Page

1434

Share

COinS